[mirror-admin] download-i2.fedoraproject.org slightly behind?

[Scott Baker]

We sync from kernel.org and I haven't seen the bitflip yet either:

root at white(/home/mirror/fedora/releases/test)
:ls -lsa
total 12
0 drwxr-xr-x.  4 2000 2000   47 May  6 08:24 .
4 drwxr-xr-x. 20 2000 2000 4096 Oct 30  2015 ..
4 drwxr-xr-x.  8 2000 2000 4096 Mar 24 15:58 24_Alpha
4 drwxr-x---.  8 2000 2000 4096 May  6 08:57 24_Beta

On 05/11/2016 08:17 AM, HEAnet Mirror Admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We (ftp.heanet.ie) mirror from download-i2.fedoraproject.org, as it's
> significantly faster for us than the main master mirrors - we reach it
> via the GEANT academic network.
>
> However, yesterday I noticed that the 24_Beta "bitflip" hadn't occurred
> by 1500 UTC, even though we had the data staged for several days.
>
> It did finally occur this morning around 0900 UTC (we mirror every 6
> hours or so). 
>
> Comparing the timestamps of fullfilelist on each host, they do appear
> to be some time apart:
>
> rsync --list-only
> download-i2.fedoraproject.org::fedora-buffet0/fedora/fullfilelist
> .. 8< ..
> -rw-r--r--   245749611 2016/05/10 21:46:05 fullfilelist
> .. 8< ..
>
> rsync --list-only
> dl.fedoraproject.org::fedora-buffet0/fedora/fullfilelist
> .. 8< ..
> -rw-r--r--   245753286 2016/05/11 15:34:54 fullfilelist
> .. 8< ..
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Mirroring/Tiering lists
> download-i2.fedoraproject.org as a master mirror that tier 1 mirrors
> such as ourselves should pull from.
>
> Is download-i2.fedoraproject.org still considered a master mirror? Or
> should we go back to pulling from dl.fedoraproject.org?
>
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
>
> rg 


-- 
Scott Baker - Canby Telcom 
Senior System Administrator - RHCE

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/mirror-admin/attachments/20160511/ed7f0d99/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
--