[ale] DIY NAS vs Boxed NAS?
Jeff Hubbs
jhubbslist at att.net
Fri Nov 30 21:27:12 EST 2018
On 11/30/18 3:26 PM, Alex Carver via Ale wrote:
> Given the proliferation of various boxed NAS devices like Synology,
> QNAP, etc.
Avoid them all. I have never seen such a device used where a situation
didn't eventually arise where it wouldn't have been a crisis if it had
instead been a proper admin-controlled Linux system running Samba, NFS,
etc.
The horrors come down to one simple characteristic: having your *only*
access to the shared filesystem be over the network using the associated
protocol. An enterprise-grade 26-drive file server I built for A
Previous Employer^tm was able to scan its shared-out filesystem for
viruses using ClamAV at over 200MiB/s and was awesome for performing
searches for files that a user had misplaced due to an errant mouse
drag. It made squashfs files as online backups every night in parallel
with printing to tape over a captive net shared with an auxiliary
warm-spare file server and a derelict Sun Sunfire connected to a SCSI
tape library.
I could go on and on but really, prefab NASses are for people who don't
have a way to do anything else. That's perfectly fine, of course - but
we run Linux to not be constrained like that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20181130/ae2029a0/attachment.html>
More information about the Ale
mailing list