[ale] Ubuntu recommendations
Ron Frazier
atllinuxenthinfo at c3energy.com
Sun Jun 26 01:48:00 EDT 2011
Chuck,
Thanks for all the info. See comments in line below.
Sincerely,
Ron
On 6/24/2011 7:23 PM, Chuck Peters wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ron Frazier
> <atllinuxenthinfo at c3energy.com <mailto:atllinuxenthinfo at c3energy.com>>
> wrote:
>
> This thread's a bit old but I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents.
> The guys
> over at the Going Linux podcast http://www.goinglinux.com/ seem to
> say,
> from accounts from listeners, to not do upgrades.
>
>
> Upgrades can break things, and new installs can be broken as well.
> Usually a little problem solving will fix either case. If it is
> important to you or a production system, upgrades or new installs
> should be tested prior to making changes.
>
> If a user has problems with an upgrade, it often has something to do
> with user profile settings. In that case just move the profile or
> delete it. For example firefox settings are in ~/.mozilla, openoffice
> is in ~.openoffice.org <http://openoffice.org> and libreoffice in
> .libreoffice etc... Or you can spend more time and figure out
> whatever it is in the profile and fix it, and that usually isn't worth
> the time.
>
> Profile settings, as well as flash cookies and the browser cache and
> cookies can sometimes get foobarred. A couple recent problems I
> helped users with were dolphin, the KDE file manager and gmail.
> Deleting the dolphin profile and deleting the browser cookies and
> cache fixed them.
>
> Later, I installed Ubuntu 10.04 with a fresh
> install by wiping out the Linux partition and am still using it. I've
> noticed the upgrade to 10.10 prompt but haven't bitten the hook.
>
>
> That doesn't sound right, if you installed LTS you should not be
> prompted for an upgrade until the next LTS.
>
> What does your /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades contain?
>
> root at darwin:~# cat /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades
> # Default behavior for the release upgrader.
>
> [DEFAULT]
> # Default prompting behavior, valid options:
> #
> # never - Never check for a new release.
> # normal - Check to see if a new release is available. If more than
> one new
> # release is found, the release upgrader will attempt to
> upgrade to
> # the release that immediately succeeds the currently-running
> # release.
> # lts - Check to see if a new LTS release is available. The upgrader
> # will attempt to upgrade to the first LTS release available
> after
> # the currently-running one. Note that this option should
> not be
> # used if the currently-running release is not itself an LTS
> # release, since in that case the upgrader won't be able to
> # determine if a newer release is available.
> Prompt=lts
Actually, I changed the setting from LTS to normal in the Synaptic
preferences screen. I didn't know you could upgrade from LTS to LTS.
>
> For me, fresh
> installs, regardless of being Windows or Linux, are very tedious,
> because there are many dozens of little settings and tweaks to the
> system that I do, plus installing user apps, that take about a week to
> get through. I don't like doing them.
>
>
> Did you know about the dpkg --get-selections and --set-selections?
> It may not be the best thing to use directly when an upgrade is
> involved, but it can help get a system back where it was when
> reinstalling.
I wasn't familiar with that. Can you elaborate some, or point me to a
reference on it? Sounds interesting. Many of the tweaks I mention are
related to configuring security settings and applications. I'm going to
elaborate on that in a post I'll enter shortly on securing a computer.
I don't know how much of this can be automated, but I'm always willing
to consider new options.
> So, for now, I'm still with
> 10.04. There are two other reasons I'm not upgrading. Firefox 4,
> which
> broke almost all my nice status bar apps when I installed it on
> Windows,
> so I immediately reverted back to the older version.
>
>
> Firefox 4 had its last release, now you can try FF5 which has bug
> fixes and security updates for FF4. And the Mozilla folks have a
> meeting next week to try and decide how long they will support the 3.6
> series. I think the Mozilla people are doing a great job at confusing
> users...
>
I guess I'll move to FF5 when they force me to. I'm still on 3.6.18. I
keep saying No Thanks to the Upgrade Now prompt. It took me days to
retrograde my Windows machines and get my plugins working again after I
made the mistake of upgrading to 4.0 on them. I really did not like the
changes they made at all.
> One thing I would like to know is, and I haven't found an easy
> solution, how I can run both firefox 3.6 with my old profile and the
> new firefox 5 and not have the profiles step over each other. From
> what I have learned thus far it looks like I will have to get into the
> source, tweak it and build customized packages. And what is
> most aggravating about that is modifying the Ubuntu packages and
> redistributing them could be illegal without further modifications due
> to the Mozilla Trademark and their failure to reply to my inquiry
> about the trademark licensing. Debian has good reasons for
> %s/renaming/calling/ firefox iceweasel...
I'm afraid I have no idea how to do what you describe, other than
running Firefox in a VM, or another user account.
> Then, there's also
> Unity, which I ranted about before.
>
>
> Then use the old Gnome now called "Ubuntu Classic" or KDE. It was the
> first production release of Unity, I think it will be a lot better by
> the next LTS in April 2012. I use KDE mostly and other than the
> crashes the one thing I don't like about Unity is how it works when
> one changes the focus to follow the mouse.
I never got far enough into it to try, or even know about, any of that.
I was just booting a Live CD to verify that it had burned correctly.
Unity came up and I immediately hated it on several levels. I guess
I'll get around to trying some of that, but for now, I'm just sticking
with Ubuntu 10.04.
>
> Chuck
>
--
(PS - If you email me and don't get a quick response, you might want to
call on the phone. I get about 300 emails per day from alternate energy
mailing lists and such. I don't always see new messages very quickly.)
Ron Frazier
770-205-9422 (O) Leave a message.
linuxdude AT c3energy.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20110626/f97861f2/attachment.html
More information about the Ale
mailing list