[ale] (OT) Fate of SCO

[Paul Cartwright]

On 4/11/2011 9:55 AM, Ken Cochran wrote:
> Actually (IIRC), Xenix was itself originally/initially
> a *Microsoft* product (and ran on 8086/80186 hardware),
> and I "think" it might have even pre-dated MS-DOS itself.
> Apparently they wanted to have "Unix" but escape the AT&T
> trademark/license/royalty.  I remember (partially) supporting
> & subsequently replacing a Tandy 6000 and a number of Altos
> systems (all running Xenix) with i386 systems, running SCO
I installed Xenix on a few AT&T 8086 PC's. we had to swap out a PAL chip
as I recall..
-- 

-- 
Paul Cartwright

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20110411/5ad7644c/attachment.html