[ale] uptime?
Geoffrey
lists at serioustechnology.com
Mon Dec 28 20:08:45 EST 2009
John G. Heim wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pat Regan" <thehead at patshead.com>
> To: "Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!" <ale at ale.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 4:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [ale] uptime?
>
>> On 12/28/2009 10:56 AM, Geoffrey wrote:
>>> 11:09am up 771 days 14:30, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>>> ^^^
>> You're ahead of my Xen host server :(
>>
>> 17:13:12 up 643 days, 5:12, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.04, 0.01
>>
>> The uptime and kernels of the guests aren't as high or old :)
>
> Yeah, linux is amazing isn't it? I have a linux box in my basement that
> serves as a front end to our DSL service. It runs a caching DNS server,
> dhcp, samba, etc. I do automatic backups of anything stored on the network
> drive. Its all very nice. Anyway, one time I logged in and was kind of
> surprised to see that the machine had been up for over 400 days. It was just
> sitting there in the basement serving the household needs for over a year
> without me even giving it a thought.
>
> It's a beautiful thing.
My most amazing machine is a Pentium with 32m of memory. It runs motion
24/7 on a camera that 'watches' my driveway. It sits with a constant
load average over 1, with motion eating up 99% cpu. It just plugs away.
It's had uptimes in excess of 400 days. The amazing thing is, it's
caught some great lightening shots. I can't imagine that it would ever
be fast enough to capture such photos.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson
More information about the Ale
mailing list