Ubuntu Distro Discussions (Re: [ale] linux recommendations)

[James Sumners]

Agreed. There is no need to bash Mark in such a manner. We established that his
comment was false and he admitted it once he took the time to look at the
evidence. This letter is _not_ representative of me or my feelings and I object
to it being sent to Unbuntu Linux on my behalf. The letter doesn't even contain
all the facts of the civil discussion that took place much less a decent link to
the discussion.

On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 04:19:01 -0500
Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey at proteus-tech.com> wrote:

> Get this crap off this list. The only slander going on is yours against Mark,
> the United States, and our government. Slander is when you show clear ill
> will, usually knowingly false, as is the case in your remarks below. Mark's
> words were simply misguided and, supposedly ignorant, but justifiably
> confused. He has since publically retracted his words and, in doing so, even
> demonstrated that his motives never contained ill will as he wanted to like
> the creators of the distro. You have shown a willingness to ignore
> clarifications posted on this list hours before your self-serving vitriol -
> all the while hypocritically waving the flag of "open discourse and fairness".
> I won't even comment on your bizarre stream of consciousness involving
> international terrorists, AIDs victims and opinion polls... you've just really
> outdone yourself.

-- 
James Sumners
http://ug.dyndns.org/~jsumners/

"All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological
personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the
corruptible. Such people have a tendency to become drunk on violence, a
condition to which they are quickly addicted."

Missionaria Protectiva, Text QIV (decto)
CH:D 59