[ale] Debian or Slackware package management
Frank Z.
fzamenski at voyager.net
Sat Nov 8 06:33:58 EST 2003
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:59:03PM -0500, Jim Seymour wrote:
> > of these has the easiest package manager to use when adding
programs that
> > are in tar form (ex: nmap-3.48.tar.gz). I do like the idea of
using a
> > package manager to ease removal/updating/adding of programs. So
Debian's
> > dh_make or Slackware's makepkg and why is it easier? I had very
little
>
> Slackware's probably the simplest, while Debian's dpkg format is by
far
> the most complicated when to creating packages.
>
> > success with creating rpm's (spec files, diffs, etc.) and hope
there is an
> > easier way.
>
> RPM .spec files are pretty strightforward. The problems you describe
> would apply to any packaging system.
>
> - Pizza
> --
> Solomon Peachy
pizza at f*cktheusers.org
> ICQ
#1318444
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur Melbourne,
FL
>
More information about the Ale
mailing list