[ale] Feedback on Wireless Standards

[Stuffed Crust]

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:09:45AM -0500, Kilroy, Chris wrote:
> A: (+) faster and not as prone to interference
>    (-) shorter range, more expensive
 
(-)  No adapters supported with Linux drivers
(+)  many, many nn-overlapping ccahannels

> B:  (+) cheapest, decent range
>    (-) prone to interference

(+)  Many adapters well-supported under Linux

> G:  (+) supposed to combine the best of both of the above
>    (-)  standard not agreed upon yet, expensive.

(-)  No adapters supported with Linux drivers
(-)  With any 802.11b devices throughput drops dramatically.

 - Pizza
-- 
Solomon Peachy                                   pizza at f*cktheusers.org
                                                           ICQ #1318444
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur                 Melbourne, FL

 PGP signature