[ale] Reply-To Issue [New Thread]

[aaron]

On Tuesday 22 April 2003 12:45, Mike Lockhart wrote:
> I can't do that due to the fact that I use evolution for my email.  
> - mike

It occurred to me that the minority with objections to "Reply-to=[List]" might 
want to double check the filter options on their mail clients.

The programable action choices for filtered messages in KMail are
quite extensive and, on review, include:
- Set Reply-to To:
- Remove Header:
- Pipe through:
- Add Header:
- Rewrite Header:

It was also nice to confirm that I have a good "reply-to=[List] " solution if 
ALE ever devolves back to the old ways... ;-)

I'm in agreement that a web mail avenue is not at all desirable.

peace
aaron

 
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 08:42, Mike Still wrote:
> > Ok I don't see why procmail can't do what people want.. something like
> > this should work.
> > 
> > :0
> > * ^List-Id: ale at ale.org
> > | formail -I"Reply-To:"
> > 
> > this deletes the reply-to field so your mailer should just re: from:
> > 
> > I haven't actually tested this, just put it together from the procmail
> > faq and formail man page.  Somebody test this please...
> > 
> > If this doesn't work then something similar should be able to be used.

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale