[ale] Bangalore Bill

[Michael H. Warfield]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:53:52AM -0500, F. Grant Robertson wrote:

> Care to cite your turncoat?  I'd love to read up on it.  Clinton's
> protest of Vietnam is pretty well documented but, sure, have it your
> way.. the poor guy was framed.. Now who's the conspiracy theorist?

	He published a whole book on it.  He was a Republican publicist
who now claims that when he refused to write some trash about Hillory
Clinton (something about contrary to facts and unethical publication)
that his "handlers" turned on him and cut him out of their circle.
He claims, in his book, to have first hand knowlege of the setup
in Arkansaw and the payoffs to Trip and Jones and the troopers and the
whole crew as well as who orchestrated it.  I caught him on cross-fire
facing one of the names he named in the book.  Their rejoinder seemed
to boil down to refrains of "it a lie, it's a lie, you know it's a lie"
and little more.  It's a "he said / she said" kinda thing but he WAS
a first hand participant in whatever was going on behind the scenes.
I'll see if I can find his name for you.  If he was lying, he certainly
should be facing a whole PILE of defamation suits by now.

> Oh, and, "better source"? All due respect to James Kinney, I believe I'm
> the one who dug up the verbatim quote. Get over yourself, I never
> insulted you, I never questioned your character.  It's a classic tactic
> of those who are failing to win debates to attack the credibility of
> their opponent.  I never attacked your credibility, only your argument.

	Got his message way before I got yours...

> I'd ask what "AYPI" means but, honestly I don't care. You've proved
> yourself to have less than a leg to stand on, and I obviously wasted my
> time in trying to correct your mistakes. Forgive me, I'm a sucker for
> the uninformed.

	And Your Point Is?

> ?The enemy isn?t conservatism. The enemy isn?t liberalism. The enemy is
> bullshit."  ?Lars-Erik Nelson

	Ain't that da trueth...

> On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 00:11, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:58:06PM -0500, F. Grant Robertson wrote:
> > > Several other VPs succeeded their boss, however, these three shared the
> > > same distinction as Ford by either not being re-elected or not running
> > > for office when the term expired. 
> > 
> > 	Ah...  But they WERE elect to the office of VP, which Ford
> > was not.  Semantic detail, agreed, and I accept the correction as
> > a clarification.  Ford was not elected to the post from which he
> > assended to the presidency.  Is that better?
> > 
> > > I have zero respect for a Commander in Chief who openly protested the US
> > > military on foreign soil. Added to which, the issue of Monica Lewinski
> > > was not one of who screwed who but of who obstructed justice, and who
> > > compromised national security to get their willie wet. Monica aside,
> > 
> > 	Let's not forget the Republican publicist turncoat who now
> > indicates that this was a deliberate effort to frame Clinton.  Hmmm
> > maybe entrap would be better.  In another country, the term traitor
> > would be more appropriate.  Don't know who deserves to be behind
> > bars more.  Some of them "officers" who were "encouraged" to commit
> > perjury or the individuals who "encouraged" them with some long green...
> > Funny, how that didn't get as much play...
> > 
> > > Clinton's record of obstruction is long and well documented with _many_
> > > suspicious deaths of people who held relevant information. Journalists,
> > > bodyguards, staff members..  people just had a nasty habit of assuming
> > 
> > 	Hahahahahahahaha...  OMG...  The conspiracy theorist crawls
> > out of the wood work!  This does make my day.  To goad someome into
> > bringing out this muckrake!  Hahahahahaha!!!!!
> > 
> > > room temperature after having known Clinton and having inside access to
> > > information that could have been damaging to his ability to thwart the
> > > justice system.  
> > 
> > > Oh, and while I'm ripping apart your attempt at humor, it was Dan Quale
> > > who said, and I quote, 
> > 
> > > "I was recently on a tour of Latin America, and the only regret I have
> > > was that I didn't study Latin harder in school so I could converse with
> > > those people."
> > 
> > 	Yup...  Already got that from a better source...
> > 
> > > You won't find me defending Danforth. However, I will say that "potatoe"
> > > is an acceptable alternate spelling, as per the Oxford English
> > > Dictionary.
> > 
> > 	AYPI?
> > 
> > > -G
> > 
> > > Oh, by the way... here's a box of band-aids.<grin>
> > 
> > 	Box of band-aids?  OMH...

	Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
  /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/       |  (678) 463-0932   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

 PGP signature