[ale] A call to Audit M$...

[phrostie]

you know i was thinking the same thing today.
i'd be happy with more mainstream press coverage of the MS/BSA  "audits".
no one beleaves me that this stuff is going on.

On Friday 10 May 2002 17:53, you wrote:
> Can you picture it?
>
> 3 or 4 of the bigger Open Source Projects, that have some backing from
> large vendors and can afford to have some high-powered attorneys do the
> paperwork, institute a lawsuit to audit M$, to make sure that they are not
> stealing any GPL software and incorporating it into their code.
>
> Of course it would help immensely if it was known ahead of time that they
> had appropriated some GPL code, and it could be proven...
>
> I mean, fair is fair, right?  If they are gonna demand that everyone else
> honor *their* license agreements, at gunpoint, then why shouldn't the Open
> Source Community pay them back in kind?
>
> Can anyone say 'deep pockets'?
>
> Just thinking out loud...
>
>
>                      /'^'\
>                     ( o o )
> ----------------oOOO--(_)--OOOo-|
> Charles Marcus                  |
>
>
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should
> be sent to listmaster at ale dot org.

-- 
Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS,
and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
http://www.freelists.org/list/cad-linux

---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.