[ale] SMTP Servers

[Matty]

Greg wrote:
> If it is a relatively simple deal, OpenBSD's code audited and stable version
> of Sendmail might be ok, otherwise I am w/ John - Qmail or Postfix

I am not so sure I trust their auditing practices. They audited SSH, and
look what happened ;) I prefer postfix myself.

> 
> Greg Canter
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ale-admin at ale.org [mailto:ale-admin at ale.org]On Behalf Of John
>>Councilman
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:27 PM
>>To: ale at ale.org
>>Subject: RE: [ale] SMTP Servers
>>
>>
>>You are asking for a religious war......
>>
>>Qmail and Postfix are probably the best two to choose between though.
>>
>>John
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ale-admin at ale.org [mailto:ale-admin at ale.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
>>Hubbs
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:21 PM
>>To: ale at ale.org
>>Subject: [ale] SMTP Servers
>>
>>
>>What's the current state-of-the-art on Open Source SMTP server software
>>for Linux?  This will be for commercial use, and something for which
>>paid support is available might be a good thing.  Ease of
>>configurability (i.e., better than Hylafax) is also a good thing.
>>
>>I'd also be interested to know about spam filtering, as I've seen that
>>subject fly by here a few times.
>>
>>- Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ale mailing list
>>Ale at ale.org
>>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ale mailing list
>>Ale at ale.org
>>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale



_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale