[ale] OT: Microsoft moves to comply with DOJ settlement deal]
Fulton Green
ale at FultonGreen.com
Tue Aug 6 14:58:02 EDT 2002
Yeah, but the inline comments also mentioned that the APIs would be fee-
based, so that was what I was calling attention to. Maybe the original
poster to the newsgroup was describing another set of APIs. Not that it
matters a whole lot; turns out even the most basic Visual Studio .NET
package will set you back at least $600 (or $1000 if you don't have an
upgrade path). There are stand-alone editions of Visual C++ and Visual C#
for $110 each, but still, why should I have to pay for the privilege of
developing for M$ OSen when I can develop for Linux or Java for free?!?
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 02:46:24PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> Fulton Green wrote:
> > FUD alert ... the PressPass article I read (available at
> > http://www.Microsoft.com/presspass/legal/aug02/08-05settlementmilestones.asp )
> > indicates that the APIs will be available at "no additional charge". I'm
> > assuming that the "original charge" in this case would be the cost of
> > purchasing the Visual Studio IDE and NOT the cost of licensing the
> > proprietary protocols.
>
> What I see from this link matches what I see on the Microsoft link you
> provided. At issue is this piece:
>
> The availability of approximately 113 proprietary protocols that server
> vendors can license and use as a new way of achieving interoperability
> with Windows desktops.
>
> Note the wording 'vendors can license,' meaning PAY FOR.
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 02:07:46PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> >
> >>As usual, Microsoft is doing it their way. I've left the comments of
> >>the original poster as they have some insight, but check out the url for
> >>yourself.
> >>
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>This came over a bit ago, courtesy of Computerworld. I strongly suggest
...
> >>to do this gratis, given that they appear to have escaped a fine; the second
> >>thing is the APIs will also be fee-based, and lastly, there is a digital
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list