[ale] IE for Linux

[Josh Murrah]

Same here on both counts.  IE 3.02 runs well for me under '95, as it's a
M$ product it is integrated better, IMVHO.  On the other hand, I don't
know who in their right mind would download IE for linux.  Not that I'm
against M$ building IE for linux, maybe more ignorant IS managers will say
"what's this -linux- thing?  I see that M$ supprts it, it must be good"

=8-]


Josh Murrah, jmurrah at salug.org, http://www.salug.org/~jmurrah, ICQ 4613433
------------------------~~~===<[^]>===~~~----------------------------
This mail is a natural product.  The slight variations in spelling and
grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to
be considered flaws or defects.

On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Dave Brooks wrote:

> Im probably going to get wailed on for this, Bu i think the opposite is
> true.  For me, IE 3.02 is very stable.  Netscape seems to be the one
> crashing.  In Linux, however, netscape is VERY stable.  I dont think an IE
> for linux would hold up though, after all, dosetn that anti-m$ attitude
> seem prevalent in the Linux community?
> 
> -dave 
> 
> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Jim Lynch wrote:
> 
> > I'm not surprised.  I tried to use IE on Win95 and it failed miserably.
> > Why did I bother?
> > 
> > Jim.
> > ---------  Received message begins Here  ---------
> > 
> > > 
> > > chrisf at computone.com wrote:
> > > > It seems that IE for Solaris 2.5.1 is out but not Linux
> > > 
> > > A co-worker of mine tried it... said it failed miserably.
> > > 
> > > -Amy
> > > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jim Lynch, SGI/Cray Research, Inc. / ARS: K4GVO
> > Phone: (770) 631-2254, Email: jwl at sgi.com
> > Suite 270, 200 Westpark Drive, Peachtree City, GA 30269
> > 
> > 
> 
> --------------------------------
> Dave Brooks         
> spork at chefmike.com 
> http://spork.777.net
> 
> --------------------------------
>