[mirror-admin] how does everyone feel about carrying cloud images?
Seamus Ryan
s.ryan at uber.com.au
Mon Oct 8 15:57:48 EDT 2012
No objections here, I support this.
Regards
Seamus
Sent from my <insert "i" device here>
On 09/10/2012, at 6:19 AM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:45:13PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> We'd like to do both raw and qcow2; right now, the raw image is zero-padded
>>> 10GB, which is not so ideal, but in F18 it will start small and correctly
>>> expand, so it will be as big as the actual installed image. In theory this
>>> is a "JEOS" image, but since minimal has historically not been a Fedora
>>> priority, it's not (yet) tiny. I don't know the actual size yet, but it
>>> should be smaller than the LiveCD (eventually down under 100GB). If we can
>> 100GB? Is that a typo?
>
> Hahh yes. MB.
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
>
> --
--
More information about the Mirror-admin
mailing list