[mirror-admin] how does everyone feel about carrying cloud images?

Seamus Ryan s.ryan at uber.com.au
Mon Oct 8 15:57:48 EDT 2012


No objections here, I support this.

Regards
Seamus

Sent from my <insert "i" device here>

On 09/10/2012, at 6:19 AM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:45:13PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> We'd like to do both raw and qcow2; right now, the raw image is zero-padded
>>> 10GB, which is not so ideal, but in F18 it will start small and correctly
>>> expand, so it will be as big as the actual installed image. In theory this
>>> is a "JEOS" image, but since minimal has historically not been a Fedora
>>> priority, it's not (yet) tiny. I don't know the actual size yet, but it
>>> should be smaller than the LiveCD (eventually down under 100GB). If we can
>> 100GB?  Is that a typo?
> 
> Hahh yes. MB.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> 
> --

--



More information about the Mirror-admin mailing list