[mirror-admin] RHEL 6 Beta

[Brian Long]

On 04/21/2010 05:43 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:34 -0400, Brian Long wrote:
>>> I'm wondering why the RHEL 6 Beta was not handled in a similar fashion
>>> to the Fedora betas.  Mirrors could have staged the RHEL 6 Beta a few
>>> days ago and people wouldn't be complaining about 4.5KB/sec download
>>> rates from ftp.redhat.com.  :)
>>>
>>> /Brian/
>>
>> I'll take responsibility for the mistake there.  It was an error in
>> planning on my part.
>>
> 
> Hey! No fair, that was my sword you just fell on. To be honest there
> is a lot of blame to go around.. I expect the lessons learned meeting
> to be a lot more sword falling.
> 

I didn't want to blame anyone per se; I was just wondering if maybe the
RC (assuming there is one) could go smoother.

Next question: how often are RHEL 6 Beta updates being pushed if at all?
 In other words, how often should we run rsync against our upstream mirror?

Thanks.

/Brian/
-- 
       Brian Long                             |       |
       Corporate Security Programs Org    . | | | . | | | .
                                              '       '
                                              C I S C O

--