[mirror-admin] RHEL 6 Beta

[Will Foster]

On 21/04/10 15:43 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:34 -0400, Brian Long wrote:
>>> I'm wondering why the RHEL 6 Beta was not handled in a similar fashion
>>> to the Fedora betas.  Mirrors could have staged the RHEL 6 Beta a few
>>> days ago and people wouldn't be complaining about 4.5KB/sec download
>>> rates from ftp.redhat.com.  :)
>>>
>>> /Brian/
>>
>> I'll take responsibility for the mistake there.  It was an error in
>> planning on my part.
>>
>
>Hey! No fair, that was my sword you just fell on. To be honest there
>is a lot of blame to go around.. I expect the lessons learned meeting
>to be a lot more sword falling.
>
>
>-- 
>Stephen J Smoogen.
>“The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.”
>Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
>
>--

Please try the RHEL6 beta download again and note your speeds, I'd be interested to hear feedback.

Thanks.
-- 
Will Foster
IT Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/mirror-admin/attachments/20100422/1309bb57/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
--