[mirror-admin] Fedora 9 bits

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> said:
> Just for clarity I'm going to post all the sha1s in here.  Release date
> is May 13, 10am Eastern (1400 UTC).  I'll actually be unlocking things
> about 40 minutes before that so we can get a number of mirrors with the
> bitflip at announcement time.  Once again thanks for all the help you
> folks give us in making Fedora available!

I was using jigdo to build F9 i386, x86_64, and source ISOs on my home
mirror (using the expanded tree already synced based off of rawhide),
and it worked for i386 and source just fine, as well as for x86_64 CDs.
However, the x86_64 DVD failed; it looks like it wasn't happy with
repodata/Fedora-9-comps.xml.

Sure enough, the file from the DVD image is different from the file in
the exploded tree and the first CD image (and I resynced against a
Fedora master to make sure).  The difference is that the x86_64 DVD
comps file does not list mkinitd in the Core group.

I checked the SHA1 sum, and it matches the SHA1SUM file in the tree and
what Jesse listed.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

--