[mirror-admin] rsync_acl ...

[Matt_Domsch at Dell.com]

I had emailed the owners of these entries last week; some have cleaned
up (or justified) their rsync acl list entries.  Those noted below have
not, but I didn't want to just yank them without having spoken with
their admins first...

--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux

-----Original Message-----
From: mirror-list-d-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:mirror-list-d-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Linux at Duke
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:57 AM
To: A private discussion group for official mirrors of ftp.redhat.com
Subject: rsync_acl ...

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/rsync_acl

lists multiple fairly large network blocks.  I can't imagine that for  
example all hosts matching:

62.18.0.0/15

or

199.8.28.0/24
199.8.29.0/24
199.8.30.0/24
199.8.31.0/24
199.8.32.0/24
199.8.33.0/24
199.8.34.0/24
199.8.35.0/24

are running rsync and would require private access to other mirrors.   
Shouldn't each organization have a very small number of specific hosts  
listed in the ACL?


--

--