[ale] ALE meeting location

[DJ-Pfulio]

If you have some time, let's test jitsi-meet out.
https://meet.jit.si/ALE-NW - for a test.

The DC404 guys just tested jitsi-meet and it worked well, provided
people aren't nasty.  It is a democratic tool which is good and bad.
Worked pretty well.
Best using a chromium-based browser.  Seems not to like Firefox so much.
Requires WebRTC capable browser.

I'll be hanging out there until 15:00 today.



On 3/13/20 10:11 AM, Boris Borisov wrote:
> You don't have to even register for testing. Just think of name of the
> conference room. Let's do quickly test run. Someone to initiate session
> and post url here.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 9:27 AM DJ-Pfulio via Ale <ale at ale.org
> <mailto:ale at ale.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Took 15 yrs from their start to get there. WebRTC made it possible, if
>     you can stand the terrible security of WebRTC.
> 
>     Probably want to run any WebRTC browser inside some confinement, like a
>     firejail.  It does work in --private mode, so nothing from the browser
>     can be written to storage.  Chromium did complain, but it always
>     complains about wanting more permissions. When firefox didn't "just
>     work" with webrtc stuff 2 yrs ago, I immediately used chromium for
>     anything like that.  YMMV.
> 
> 
> 
>     On 3/12/20 7:38 PM, SpaXpert, Inc. wrote:
>     > Wow, Jitsi seems to be an amazing product.  I actually need it for one
>     > of my clients!
>     >
>     > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:13 PM DJ-Pfulio via Ale <ale at ale.org
>     <mailto:ale at ale.org>
>     > <mailto:ale at ale.org <mailto:ale at ale.org>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On 3/12/20 11:32 AM, Jim Kinney via Ale wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > Now might be a good time to experiment with Apache Meeting.
>     >
>     >     Or jisti-meet.  At ALE-NW, a new member setup the teleconf on
>     a VPS in
>     >     about 10 minutes.  The presenter doesn't need any local software
>     >     installed to share her screen.  Any WebRTC capable browser worked.
>