[ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
Jim Lynch
ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com
Tue Apr 26 16:50:10 EDT 2016
I stopped using aptitude in favor of apt-get when aptitude got into
dependency hell and the options it offered were outrageous. In those
cases apt-get didn't find any problems and went ahead and did what I
asked it to. One time I think aptitude wanted to remove libc and
everything that depended on it due to a discrepancy in some minor level
dispute.
Jim.
On 04/26/2016 04:22 PM, dev null zero two wrote:
> Apt provides a better indication of overall progress and I've found it
> to be slightly preferable in dependency resolution than aptitude.
More information about the Ale
mailing list