[ale] [Different ballpark OT weirdness] Re: Recommendations for Two factor authenticaton on Linux (RHEL)? - OT - Legal Disclaimers - Further OT - Taking OT

[dev null zero two]

all we're missing now is our dear friend who was banned from this list and
we'd have ourselves a rodeo! :-P

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have topics?
>
> What is this formatting style of which you speak? Sounds like something
> done at ye old typesetting shoppe. Threads are worked into existence by
> spinning wheels.
>
> (Jump ahead 6 weeks)
>
> [[[[[[[ OT] New rant] response to rant] RANT] <rant> OT] New Topic] new
> topic: was OT Then rant then OOT from OP rant] to many nested OT posts...
> On Apr 14, 2015 10:28 AM, "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner at dsservices.com>
> wrote:
>
>> When going off topic from the original thread please add "OT - <rant
>> subject>" to the subject so the OP at least can distinguish which responses
>> are on topic from those that aren't.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Ben
>> Coleman
>> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 2:36 PM
>> To: ale at ale.org
>> Subject: Re: [ale] Recommendations for Two factor authenticaton on Linux
>> (RHEL)?
>>
>> On 4/13/2015 12:55, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
>> > confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
>> > recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
>> > copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
>> > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
>> > transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
>> > have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you
>>
>> Do your legal people actually believe this has any legal force?  I could
>> be wrong (IANAL), but I don't think you can unilaterally impose conditions
>> on unrelated parties with whom you don't have any legal relationship.
>>
>> I'm assuming that the office email system slaps this on all outgoing
>> emails?
>>
>> Ben
>> --
>> Ben Coleman oloryn at benshome.net | For the wise man, doing right trumps
>> http://oloryn.benshome.net/     | looking right.  For the fool, looking
>> Amateur Radio NJ8J              | right trumps doing right.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150414/c663b04f/attachment.html>