[ale] {Disarmed} Re: ip over serial
Neal Rhodes
neal at mnopltd.com
Sun Oct 26 17:41:31 EDT 2014
Once we got 64kb ISDN pretty much everything afterwards was gravy.
Working with ssh sessions over 64kb ISDN, man, that was in tall cotton.
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 15:16 -0500, Boris Borisov wrote:
> ... But is good way to remind myself what the internet speeds used to
> look like ... I havent seen slow loading jpg for a while. I think to
> show it to my kids ... Bad grades in school - a day with slow
> internet :)
>
> On Friday, October 24, 2014, Boris Borisov <bugyatl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've got my mistake. Syntax is pointopoint not pointtopoint.
> Busybox ifconfig does not generate error but the "normal" one
> gives you unknown hostname pointtopoint. Learn from
> mistakes ...
>
> On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Boris Borisov
> <bugyatl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Any info is welcome ... Thanks
>
> On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Michael Trausch
> <mike at trausch.us> wrote:
>
> If possible, use PPP.
>
> Can post setup info tomorrow if desired. I
> used to use it both over serial and over UDP
> for tunnels before I started using better
> methods for VPN.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Oct 23, 2014, at 7:09 PM, "Michael H.
> Warfield" <mhw at WittsEnd.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 17:13 -0400, Jim
> Kinney wrote:
> >> Doesn't sl0 need to be in a different
> network from the ptp address? So
> >> MailScanner warning: numerical links are
> often malicious: 10.10.11.1
> >> for sl0
> >
> > No but there's no netmask specified and,
> seriously, SLIP? Good god that
> > brings back old ancient nightmares.
> >
> > I remember Novell IPX (old IPX/SPX) had
> checksums disabled and relied,
> > instead, on the link layer checksumming for
> performance reasons. SLIP
> > (as opposed to PPP) had no checksumming on
> the link layer. What could
> > possibly go wrong. I would never use SLIP
> in production.
> >
> >> On October 23, 2014 4:50:46 PM EDT, Boris
> Borisov <bugyatl at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> I'm doind the old
> >> slattach sl0 -p cslip -s
> 19200 /dev/ttyS0
> >> ifconfig sl0 10.10.10.1 pointtopoint
> 10.10.10.2 up
> >> But sl0 gets 10,10.10.2 address
> >> What could be wrong
> >> Bad ifconfig in busybox maybe?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Kinney
> >> Linux Systems Analyst
> >> Physicist/Brewer
> >> http://jimkinney.us
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike
> > --
> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061
> | mhw at WittsEnd.com
> > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932
> | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist
> believes we live in the best of all
> > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible
> worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20141026/738a0788/attachment.html>
More information about the Ale
mailing list