[ale] OT: FCC and ISP
Aaron Ruscetta
arxaaron at gmail.com
Tue Jan 21 13:35:27 EST 2014
All of these endless issues of corporate abuses and monopoly
corruption throughout the ISP and media companies just scream
in validation of the vital need for Internet Distribution to be a
commonwealth public resource. The paths of information flow
has become as vital to our public infrastructure as our public
water lines and public roadways, so it needs to be fully
recognized as such.
in peace
aaron
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Jonathan Meek
<jonathan.l.meek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's a great article that the register had on their website about the
> Verizon vs. FCC case:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/18/why_almost_everyone_got_the_net_neutrality_verdict_wrong/
>
> If I understood the article correctly, the courts ruled that while FCC has
> the power to enforce the net neutrality rules, it cannot just write them and
> placed them under the classic "common provider" rules that are used for
> voice service since Congress has passed laws that make voice service
> different from data service.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:22 PM, JD <jdp at algoloma.com> wrote:
>>
>> I ended up with 2 coax lines from the street - a for TV + residential ISP
>> and b
>> for commercial ISP. A few months later, canceled the residential TV and
>> ISP.
>> The 'b' cable was new, thicker and took a 100% shorter run to the
>> demarcation
>> point - better signal.
>>
>> Comcast was extremely clear that having "commercial TV" over the business
>> line
>> in a residential neighborhood was forbidden by the public utility
>> commission.
>> Perhaps residential TV could share the same line - don't know. Dumped CATV
>> for
>> antennas a while ago. Getting 65 channels OTA from Cobb county.
>>
>> Using the term "commicast" seems completely inappropriate. They are
>> definitely
>> capitalists, not communists or socialists. ;) Their stock price has been
>> beating
>> the SP500 the last 3 yrs or so. Capitalists, definitely.
>>
>> On 01/19/2014 09:44 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:
>> > If you have commercial internet, they'll string the TV as well.
>> >
>> > Don't take no for an answer. They can string that anywhere they have
>> > cable internet.
>> >
>> > On Jan 19, 2014 7:29 AM, "JD" <jdp at algoloma.com
>> > <mailto:jdp at algoloma.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > A person said that or a crappy automatic system?
>> > Commercial TV is not allowed at residential addresses, but
>> > commercial internet
>> > is. The only reason I would guess it isn't available would be if the
>> > building is
>> > an apartment and another line cannot be put in. Even then, I'd call
>> > and talk to
>> > a real person.
>> >
>> > On 01/18/2014 11:33 PM, Raylynn Knight wrote:
>> > > Except commiecast says commercial service is not available at my
>> > address!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
More information about the Ale
mailing list