[ale] OT fyi CryptoCat allows instant easy encrypted chat
JD
jdp at algoloma.com
Fri Aug 2 13:21:35 EDT 2013
Good-enough security is only - good enough - until it is breached. Then, if the
breach happens in a silent way, we can be using completely compromised systems
and not know any better. That seems bad to me.
On 08/02/2013 10:11 AM, Michael Trausch wrote:
> Like anything else, the security that it gives is proportional to one's
> understanding of its application and usage. I have zero experience or knowledge
> of CryptoCat, other than I follow its author on Twitter and I think he might be
> a legitimate white hat individual. But I would not trust the source without
> reading it myself or having had it read by someone whose opinion i trust on such
> matters, such as a real security professional.
>
> Security in today's world is nothing to joke about. The only thing I can say for
> sure is that if a person does not know about security themselves and doesn't
> choose to lean on a trustworthy source for security information, they will be
> compromised at some point without enough mitigation to be safe.
>
> Time tested solutions are also great from a security viewpoint. For example,
> many people have vetted Tor and understand how it works. OpenVPN is a most
> excellent means to privately communicate with a network you control, whether
> personal or corporate. Both are understood and widely deployed and audited. That
> does not ensure or guarantee perfect security, but it increases my confidence
> that it is a truly secure solution.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Pete Hardie <pete.hardie at gmail.com
> <mailto:pete.hardie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I've seen some stuff on the net claiming that cryptocat is not as secure as it
>> claims - YMMV
>>
>> Pete Hardie
>> --------
>> Better Living Through Bitmaps
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Ron Frazier (ALE)
>> <atllinuxenthinfo at techstarship.com <mailto:atllinuxenthinfo at techstarship.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wanted to pass along some info about a way to instantly set up an
>> encrypted chat session. I thought this had been on the list before, but I
>> searched my email archive and couldn't find it in the ALE folder. So,
>> please forgive if this has already been mentioned. Maybe I was on another
>> list when it was mentioned.
>>
>> Anyway, CryptoCat is a project that allows you to set up private encrypted
>> peer to peer and group chats almost instantly. It's very quick and easy
>> to use after installing the browser plugin.
>>
>> https://crypto.cat/
>>
>> It's still a work in progress, so you would have to read the docs on the
>> site and determine how much faith you want to put in it.
>>
>> There was a weakness in prior versions from 2.0 - 2.0.42 which weakened
>> the group chat. Private chats were not affected. The blog suggests
>> upgrading to 2.1.* where the problems have been fixed. Apparently there
>> was a weakness in the random number generator.
>>
>> https://blog.crypto.cat/
>>
>> Some people on the DC-404 list recommended not using this for anything too
>> sensitive, and I certainly wouldn't bet my life on it. However, I would
>> use it if I just wanted to do a quick chat that I didn't want snooped on
>> and needed moderate security. I have used it once after someone I was
>> communicating with suggested skype and I mentioned misgivings about that.
>> The process was very painless and we were chatting to each other within 5
>> minutes after I got the link from him.
>>
>> Here's the link to the Firefox plugin.
>>
>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-__US/firefox/user/kaepora/
>> <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/user/kaepora/>
>>
>> It also works on Chrome, Safari, and Mac. I guess my IE friends and
>> family are out of luck.
>>
More information about the Ale
mailing list