[ale] bash commands
Richard Bronosky
Richard at Bronosky.com
Sun May 20 19:35:52 EDT 2012
No. Windows "was meant to be done in" admin. Unix was meant to have
strict permissions enforcement. sudo -i is bad sauce.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Matthew <simontek at gmail.com> wrote:
> cause UNIX was meant to be done in root. lol Theres times when typing sudo
> every 2 seconds comes to be a pain, some distro's have su or root login
> disabled.
>
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Shawn <taaj.shawn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So why even have sudo if you use -i ?
>> Sent via BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: simontek at gmail.com
>> Sender: ale-bounces at ale.org
>> Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 19:57:31
>> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts<ale at ale.org>
>> Reply-To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
>> Subject: Re: [ale] bash commands
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
>
>
> --
> SimonTek
> 912-398-6704
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
--
.!# RichardBronosky #!.
More information about the Ale
mailing list