[ale] partitioning and /usr [was Re: Looking for recommendations on LVM + soft Raid on home server]

[Ted W]

On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Robert wrote:
>> I disagree with NOT having separate /var, /usr, /home, /tmp etc...
> 
> I've usually broken these out too.. And was surprised to find that Fedora 16
> spits out a warning if you have /usr on it's own partition. The seems to be
> something to do with the new systemd, which manages the init scripts.
> 
> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo


This may be mildly unrelated, however, does anyone have a link to a good read on WHY it's recommended that certain directories be on different partitions? I've seen a lot of talk about this and really never understood the theory behind why it's done one way vs. another.

-- 
Ted W. < Ted at Techmachine.net >
Registered GNU/Linux user #413569



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120322/9389669d/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120322/9389669d/attachment.bin