[ale] Do all new large SATA drives suck?

[Jim Kinney]

All the drive makers provide good drives in all sizes, speeds and types.
However only people who have bad experiences post "OMG! This drive is crap"
reviews as the vast majority of buyers are happy and busy using their new
drive.
On Mar 2, 2012 11:20 AM, "Neal Rhodes" <neal at mnopltd.com> wrote:

> **
> I've gone ahead and ordered an HP core i3 system to be our next Centos
> home/office server.
>
> It's  got a 1.5TB drive; normally on these off-lease units I'd buy two
> brand new drives and mirror them.  Or that's what we've done with the last
> 3 linux servers.     All of which are still technically functioning since
> Fedora core 1.
>
> This drive is likely about a year old, so I'm thinking I'll just buy a new
> 1.5TB drive and install Centos to mirror the primary.
>
> When I look at the crop of 1 - 1.5TB drives on TigerDirect and read the
> reviews, they seem to be uniformly terrible - DOA,  failed after 3 weeks,
> replacement failed after a week, etc.  Seagate seems to be the worst,
> although WD not too far behind.
>
> Ummm, isn't one of the primary selling features of a disk drive that it's
> not supposed to blow up and take down all your data with it?    Has there
> been a massive quality slip in the last couple years since I last bought
> drives?    Seriously -  I can lose a power supply, a motherboard, a display
> - you name it, and once I replace it I can expect to still have the
> data.    Yes, I should do backups, and I do, and yes, I should mirror the
> drives, and I do.    I should do SMARTD monitoring and I do.  But isn't
> this like selling tires that tend to shred randomly?    Isn't not blowing
> up catastrophically with no warning beforehand a basic selling point for
> disk drives?    What's the point of mirroring if the odds are good that
> both drives will fail completely the same week?   What's the point of
> SMARTD monitoring if the darn drive quits without warning?
>
> Does anybody make a decent drive in that size range?
>
> I'm thinking that not even considering economy,  my old theory of buying a
> pair of new identical drives may not be wise anymore, and sticking with one
> drive that has lasted over a year and one new drive is a better plan.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Neal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120302/d74cf9a0/attachment.html