[ale] VMPlayer 3 vs VirtualBox
JD
jdp at algoloma.com
Mon Jan 16 16:03:13 EST 2012
On 01/16/2012 01:44 PM, Robert Coggins wrote:
> On 12/31/2011 9:26 PM, Narahari 'n' Savitha wrote:
>> My host is Windoze 7 64 bit.
>>
>> I am debating between VMPlayer 3 vs VirtualBox 4.
>>
>> Does it even matter ? VMPlayer cannot be run headless while VirtualBox I
>> guess can be.
>>
>> Which product is more OpenSource friendly VMP or VBX ?
>>
>> -Narahari
>>
> Will VMware server not accomplish what you need?
VMware Server hasn't been updated and won't be updated anymore. EOL.
http://www.vmware.com/support/policies/lifecycle/general/index.html#policy_server
Nobody should be using "VMware Server" anymore.
As to which tool, VMware Player or Oracle VirtualBox is more opensource
friendly, just look at the license agreements. I believe VirtualBox is more
open, but they do close-source and charge businesses for many of the useful
parts - USB drivers and remote desktop AND the client tools. If you are a
business deploying VirtualBox, it is possible you need to be paying for a license.
With that said, neither is really opensource friendly in the same way that KVM
is. You are in the commercial software world running Windows. What else would
you expect?
More information about the Ale
mailing list