[ale] nailing down firefox security and privacy - PT 1
Geoffrey Myers
lists at serioustechnology.com
Wed Oct 12 13:37:10 EDT 2011
Rich Faulkner wrote:
> I have yet to read this in its entirety but I do recall a court case
> where a commercial network was intruded upon and the intruder was
> found. In the end he was off the charges because there was no notice
> posted that the network was a private network and subject to restricted
> access...thereby implying "welcome" to outside access by anyone.
>
> I for one do not broadcast SSID and use WPA2 and even lock-down access
> by MAC. If I were to do anything contrary to locking-down the wireless
> network access I would expect uninvited "guests" to be using my
> bandwidth. IMHO that's just common sense. Is it illegal to enter a
> home (uninvited) where the doors are off the hinges? Perhaps (I'm not a
> lawyer). I do know it's illegal to enter a home (uninvited) when the
> doors are locked and dead-bolted. IMHO the same logic applies to
> networks and our home wireless devices...an open door is an invitation
> to unwanted guests.
I don't know about a missing door, but it is most definitely illegal to
enter a residence whether the doors are locked or not.
I personally side with Michael on this one. Just because I don't lock
something down, doesn't mean is free for anyone to use.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson
More information about the Ale
mailing list