[ale] Help - DEB Pkg Hell

[The Don Lachlan]

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:09:22AM -0400, JD wrote:
> On SunOS, 'man tunefs' had the quote I used.
> See ref:
> http://miroirs.cesars.org/man/pages/SunOS-4.1.3/man8/tunefs.8.txt
> I thought everyone knew this. ;)
> This goes to show what is wrong with man pages today. ;)

You're citing a PROPRIETARY UNIX as canonical on this list?

For shame...

-L

> On 05/23/2011 08:07 AM, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
> > JD wrote:
> >> CRAP!  You were completely correct! 97% inodes used.
> >> Ruby gems suck inodes.
> >>
> >> $ df -i
> >> Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
> >> /dev/sda1             247504  228703   18801   93% /
> >>
> >> After cleaning a few files, I was able to clean up some kernel packages
> >> too.  On that one box, everything is fine, but the issue on the other
> >> machines is definitely different.
> >>
> >> What's the moral to this story?  On dev systems, you probably do not
> >> want the default FS settings.
> >>
> >> "You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish."
> > 
> > I believe the correct quote is:
> > 
> > You can tune a kernel, but you can't tune a fish..
> > :)
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo