[ale] hijacked threads are bad etiquette

[Greg Clifton]

I was merely responding to Aaron's post, but I probably did carry it too far
by bringing health care into the discussion and I should have said the
"somewhat free market" vs the government contolled market. I was a too
"hasty Hobbit" in my response.

In the words of 7, "I will comply."

GC

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:

> For those that are either too young to understand or too old to remember or
> too socially-inept to care, it is considered very poor etiquette to change
> the topic in a discussion thread without changing the subject line. Most
> people understand that topics drift but a shift from cool picture to horrid
> health care crosses many boundaries that should never be crossed.
>
> So let's all play in the sandbox nicely together without throwing toys and
> sand at everyone else.
>
> Anyone who hijacks another thread with politics, religion or economics will
> be moderated with no further notice. This is not the place so take it
> somewhere else.
>
>
> --
> --
> James P. Kinney III
>
> As long as the general population is passive, apathetic, diverted to
> consumerism or hatred of the vulnerable, then the powerful can do as they
> please, and those who survive will be left to contemplate the outcome.
> - *2011 Noam Chomsky*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20110609/42be39a3/attachment.html