[ale] semi [OT] running a robot with linux

[Ron Frazier]

Charles,

I had to have some reason for putting this message on this list.
Besides, since I'm planning to learn C++ anyway, I thought I'd make it
do double duty.

OK, think mars rover, but here on Earth.  Something that can go out into
the desert on it's own and collect environmental data or do
reconnaissance for the military,etc., follow a course, and return home.
Something that has built in networking capability (OK, maybe in the
desert but with 3g wireless, or possibly via satellite).  Something that
has enough storage to capture and store photos or videos along with
sensor readings.  Something where the program won't fit into a 16K ROM
chip.  Yes, power and weight are critical, but an android phone,
particularly with the screen off, isn't particularly heavy nor power
hungry. 

Now, I do understand that you wouldn't necessarily want to put a 2000 HP
engine in a Chevette, so power has its place.  I'm sitting here looking
at an automated battery charger which has some kind of microcontroller
in it, which probably cost $1.  So, a computer would be overkill.
However, I am fascinated by the idea of more capable, more powerful
robots.

Maybe I'll see you at their meeting.  I think they're discussing 3d
printing.  If you like, you can write me off list and we can discuss
circuit design ideas.  Many years ago, I got an EET degree.  I haven't
had a chance to try any of that out in terms of Robotics.  I do have a
prototype board for a Propeller 8 core microcontroller from
http://www.parallax.com/ .  Haven't had a chance to do anything with it
yet.

Sincerely,

Ron

On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:32 -0500, Charles Shapiro wrote:
> Gee whiz, I'd think a lotta processor power is overkill for most
> 'bots.  My 3d printer is capable of quite complex behaviors on a
> couple of Arduino ( http://www.arduino.cc/ ) boards loaded with simple
> software in ROM.   The trouble with those kewl speedy processors is
> that they tend to want more power and support circuitry.  If all
> you're doing with that stuff is processing more LOC (Lines of Code),
> what's the point of inviting all that extra design and debugging pain
> into it?   Especially if you're talking a moving robot, power and
> weight become critical, yes?
> 
> I've also been thinking about robots recently, 'specially now I've got
> a device that'll make, like, motor mounts in any shape I want. But I'm
> leaning toward simple software and interesting hardware 'stead of
> something as relatively heavy as linux / C++. Seems like a simple fast
> scheduler and some routines are all you really need here, 'stead of
> all that multi-user control, file system interface, cron(8) and other
> hoo-hah.  Heck, if it were 20 years ago I'd be talking FORTH.  Maybe
> that's still a good way to go.
> 
> Hey, I'm thinkin' about making my first visit to AHRC this month.
> Maybe we can argue about this there?
> 
> -- CHS
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Ron Frazier
> <atllinuxenthinfo at c3energy.com> wrote:
> > One of my interests, other than Linux, is robotics (actual moving
> > machines, not computer bots).  I sometimes visit the Atlanta Hobby Robot
> > Club ( http://botlanta.org/ ).  My ultimate goal is to build a moving
> > robot which is run with a Linux based platform for a brain, and probably
> > programmed in C++, which I'm starting to learn.  I think it would be
> > really cool to run a robot using an Android phone or tablet, or possibly
> > one of those little embedded computers.  However, I think the embedded
> > computer market is behind because a phone or tablet has much more
> > computer power, memory, built in screen, wireless, network interface,
> > usb, etc.  I specifically want to use C++, rather than C, where
> > functions exist to do a task in both languages.  Lots of embedded
> > computers can be programmed in C, but not C++.  I also want the robot to
> > be able to do more complex tasks than just following a line, etc.
> > That's why I'm leaning toward a more sophisticated controller.  I'd
> > appreciate any pointers toward resources for this type of project.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Ron


-- 

(PS - If you email me and don't get a quick response, you might want to
call on the phone.  I get about 300 emails per day from alternate energy
mailing lists and such.  I don't always see new messages very quickly.)

Ron Frazier

770-205-9422 (O)   Leave a message.
linuxdude AT c3energy.com