[ale] [ot] Xmpp, ejabberd question

[Jim Kinney]

Hmm. Somwone needs to update the rsync man pages to reflect -e default is
ssh
On Dec 27, 2011 10:12 AM, "Brian Mathis" <brian.mathis+ale at betteradmin.com>
wrote:

> There's no need for the -e stuff for a long time now.  Rsync uses ssh
> by default on all modern versions.  You get the same effect using the
> simpler form of:
>
>    rsync -P file.to.transfer username at remote.host:/path/store/file/
>
> ❧ Brian Mathis
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:44 PM, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > XMPP is really not the right tool for this. Rsync is what you want:
> >
> > $ rsync -P -e "ssh -l username" file.to.transfer
> > remote.host:/path/store/file/
> >
> > Where "username" is the SSH user you will be using to transfer the file.
> >
> >
> > On Monday, December 26, 2011, Wolf Halton <wolf.halton at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> What would be wrong with using xmpp as a transfer protocol for moving
> >> backups of tarred files? I have used scp for this purpose, but if the
> tunnel
> >> is broken, the file is corrupted. From what I have been reading, if a
> >> session drops in xmpp, it picks up where it was dropped and continues.
> I am
> >> working inside a c-class private subnet.
> >>
> >> http://sourcefreedom.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20111227/0f1ad949/attachment.html