[ale] Followup to keysigning party.

[Jeremy T. Bouse]

On 12/10/2011 09:27 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 03:10 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: 
>> 	Okay... It's after 3am I should double check before hitting send...
>> pool.sks-keyservers.net is the correct hostname
> 
> wwwkeys.us.pgp.net also works just fine and is the US geographical
> region pool to the pgp.net keyservers of which pool.sks-keyservers.net
> is a part of or interacts with.  They all flood each other.
> 

	Yes, most of the key servers all flood to one another; however, the
older key servers were notorious for corrupting keys with multiple
subkeys. For that reason I'd long since moved away from them. I did just
look and it would appear that the pgp.net key servers are now using SKS
1.1.0 while sks-keyservers.net is using 1.0.10. I'd have to see if
there's any major differences that I'm not aware of.

>> On 12/10/2011 03:09 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
>>> 	Sorry good catch... I should have just cut-n-paste rather than trying
>>> to type the command out manually...
>>>
>>> 	The correct host is pool.sks-servers.net
>>>
>>> On 12/10/2011 02:01 AM, Tim Watts wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 01:09 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
>>>>> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-servers.net --send-key YourKeyId
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure about that host?
>>>>
>>>> $ gpg --keyserver pool.sks-servers.net --send-key C70508A5
>>>> gpg: sending key C70508A5 to hkp server pool.sks-servers.net
>>>> gpgkeys: HTTP post error 6: Couldn't resolve host 'pool.sks-servers.net'
>>>> gpg: keyserver internal error
>>>> gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error
>>>>