[ale] SSH Cisco Networking Issue
Michael H. Warfield
mhw at WittsEnd.com
Tue Sep 28 09:41:32 EDT 2010
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 08:32 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 05:30 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > On Mon September 27 2010, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > You MIGHT try "ping -M do -s 1500 host" and see if it breaks. The "-M
> > > do" says do prohibit fragmentation (don't ask - I don't know why it's
> > > that way) and the -s 1500 sets the packet size. Back it down till it
> > > works. If it does, you have your smoking gun. Still, I'm not sure I
> > > can guarantee the test.
>
> > so, I am an atnex.net customer, and I tried that with this line:
> > ping -M do -s 1460 atnex.net
> > PING atnex.net (208.65.89.2) 1460(1488) bytes of data.
> > 1468 bytes from www.atnex.net (208.65.89.2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=124 time=51.4 ms
> > 1468 bytes from autodiscover.atnex.net (208.65.89.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=124
> > time=50.5 ms
> > <SNIP>
>
> > --- atnex.net ping statistics ---
> > 7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6022ms
> > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.198/50.853/51.470/0.446 ms
>
> > with anything higher I got this:
> > From paulandcilla.homelinux.org (192.168.10.2) icmp_seq=2 Frag needed and DF
> > set (mtu = 1492)
> > ^Cndcilla.homelinux.org (192.168.10.2) icmp_seq=2 Frag needed and DF set (mtu
> > = 1492)
>
> > --- atnex.net ping statistics ---
> > 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3908 errors, 100% packet loss, time 2459ms
>
> > so should I set my router to 1460? I had always used 1492, but I really can't
> > remember why!
>
> 1) That -s is the payload size. Don't forget the size of the smtp
Sometimes I have got to stop multitasking... icmp^^^^
> header in there. I really shouldn't have written -s 1500 but I was
> typing fast and wasn't thinking.
>
> 2) You are getting "Frag needed and DF set" so PMTU discovery should
> work properly and you don't need to artificially reduce your MTU
> anyways.
>
> The time you would need to fine tune the MTU is if you were getting
> timeouts. Both the cases you described above, everything is working
> fine. Leave it alone.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100928/7f94faf0/attachment.bin
More information about the Ale
mailing list