[ale] Fedora or Centos - which is more relevant for someone wanting Red Hat experience today?

[Avery Ceo]

CentOS actually has 2 extended repositories:

1) CentosPlus is disabled by default, and contains upgrades to packages that
are part of the base install but have not been shipped in RHEL.

2) CentosExtras is for packages that don't exist in the official RedHat
repositories, and is ENABLED BY DEFAULT.  Normally this would not be a bad
thing, but you will probably want to limit yourself (for purposes of
certification) to tools that are available on RHEL.  In that case, you will
need to disable this repository manually.

Avery

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Lightner, Jeff <jlightner at water.com> wrote:

> Ditto what everyone else is saying.   We use RHEL for commercial
> purposes here and I have a CentOS workstation and don't see enough
> differences to matter.  For your purposes CentOS is the way to go.
>
> CentOS on the other hand is a binary compile of RHEL sources as stated
> by others.
>
> However, others are incorrect in saying Fedora is a RHEL wannabe.
> Fedora is a bleeding edge distro and its development is supported by
> RedHat.   Most things that end up in RHEL originally were tested in
> Fedora but not everything that was put in Fedora ends up in RHEL.  It's
> a good OS if you like trying the latest greatest but not one you'd want
> to use in Production unless you like the idea of having to upgrade a
> couple of times a year.
>
> All 3 have similarities because of the relationship (mainly in admin
> tools) but RHEL and CentOS of the same version are the closest to each
> other.   Fedora versions are released much more frequently so where both
> RHEL and CentOS are currently up to release 5.4 Fedora is up to Release
> 12.
>
> On a final note:  CentOS has an extended repository available.  If you
> use that then you'll be different from RHEL so for your purposes you
> shouldn't - just use the default CentOS repositories.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael H. Warfield
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:31 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!
> Cc: mhw at wittsend.com
> Subject: Re: [ale] Fedora or Centos - which is more relevant for someone
> wanting Red Hat experience today?
>
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:07 -0500, Jerald Sheets wrote:
> > Eh?  I find them to be nearly identical.
>
> RHEL includes some pieces which can not be redistributed.  If you're not
> using them, they are pretty much identical outside of cosmetics.
> > ---
> > Jerald M. Sheets jr.
> >
> >
> >         - CentOS is basically RHL with all the RedHat stuff stripped
> >         out.
>
> Mike
> --
> Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
>   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |
> http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
>   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best
> of all
>  PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of
> it!
>
> Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
>
> Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
> ----------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
> information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of
> the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply
> immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and
> delete it. Thank you.
> ----------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100206/4662a042/attachment.html