[ale] [TEST2] does firegpg show valid sig for gmail/firegpg originated msgs...

[Tim Watts]

OK, so what I'm observing in gmail/firegpg is that firegpg-originated msgs
have all the multipart/signed stuff in them but firegpg says: "FireGPG
checked this mail but found no signature or encrypted content". I don't even
see the "wrong sig" msg that others have seen. I'm using firegpg 0.7.10 on
firefox 3.5.5, Ubuntu 9.10.

More importantly, I see that the raw msg received at gmail does NOT have the
wrapped header but it DOES in evolution. Is it possible that the *email
client* is doing the wrapping not mailman?

But it's weird that Jim first observed in gmail/firegpg that a
firegpg-originated msg showed as invalid but now it's magically "fixed".


On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse <jeremy.bouse at undergrid.net
> wrote:

> timtwatts at gmail.com wrote:
> > this time shutdown evo so it i can see it arrive in gmail. sorry for the
> > noise...
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>        As seen by Thunderbird 2.0.0.23/Enigmail 0.96.0...
>
> gpg command line and output:
> /usr/bin/gpg
> gpg: Signature made Sun 29 Nov 2009 02:30:50 PM EST using RSA key ID
> A394BC7A
> gpg: BAD signature from "Tim Watts (Clifton Farm) <timtw at earthlink.net>"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20091129/39af71cb/attachment.html