[ale] OT Linksys primiscuous mode
Greg Clifton
gccfof5 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 22 11:24:41 EST 2009
OK, so a hub keeps it simple. But if a hub cannot be found, he can use a
switch, provided that the switch can do port mirroring, in order to get a
copy of the traffic?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ed Cashin <ecashin at noserose.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Greg Clifton <gccfof5 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > At low cost of hardware these days (5 port 10/100 switch for on the order
> of
> > $15) and a switches generally being preferred over hubs for performance
> > reasons, I expect you are right that a hub will be hard to find. Can you
> > tell me why a hub would be preferred over a switch in this situation?
>
> Hubs don't direct traffic, they blindly disperse it, so that when a
> packet goes in one port it goes out all the others. You probably
> know that already, but it relates to the situation at hand because
> of how it's used.
>
> The OP can plug the uplink into the hub and sniff all the traffic
> by plugging into another port on the hub, which is effectively the
> result you'd get without the extra hub if you could do port mirroring
> on the uplink port.
>
> --
> Ed Cashin <ecashin at noserose.net>
> http://noserose.net/e/
> http://www.coraid.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20091222/a303df69/attachment.html
More information about the Ale
mailing list