[ale] LDAP Server

[Brandon Colbert]

Sorry for the fail-over I was going to use the Master(RW) / Slave(RO) model.
With a heart beat between the two.

Cool I will check 5.3 out. Is CentOS-DS out of testing?

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:

> OpenLDAP has no automatic failover. All the others do. RedHat and
> CentOS are identical except in name. Fedora is a tad more advanced.
> They all support multi-master mode so any one can be live and any
> other can fail with auto resync when it comes back online.
>
> Recommend: CentOS 5.3 with it's LDAP.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Colbert
> <colbert.brandon at gmail.com> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I been tasked to setup a fail-over ldap solution at work. We have one
> > running openldap. I wanted to get everyone opinion on the difference
> between
> > OpenLDAP, CentOS-DS, Fedora-DS, and Redhat-DS.
> >
> > If you had your choice, which one will you use?
> >
> >
> > FYI: In the near future we will tie samba and radius with ldap.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> James P. Kinney III
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20090407/4b5b72d7/attachment.html