[ale] OT: reading email with the blackberry gmail app

[Greg Freemyer]

FYI: This is just a gripe, I don't expect a solution.

I got a blackberry a week or two ago.  I don't like having it beep at
me all the time, so I installed the mobile app google provides to read
gmail via the blackberry.

<gripe>
I've really liked it, but Chris's email below exposed a bug.  I can't
scroll down past all the IPs because the app switches from text
scrolling mode to link jumping mode automatically based on some
heuristic (think hitting the tab key on a normal browser) .  Once in
link jumping mode I can't seem to get back to text scrolling.

Oh, well I just have to live with not reading all of Chris's post via
my blackberry.

</gripe>

Greg

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Chris Fowler
<cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:
> I'm in the process of moving to our vendor's new color facility.  They
> are currently moving out of QTS  and we either must move with them
> or go somewhere else.
>
> I've received this email from them
>
> *>From our Network Administrator:
> We're doing a NAT'd VLAN for Outpostsentinal.com, so their systems will need
> to be set with the following IP range:
> 10.1.1.2-17, with a gateway of 10.1.1.1.
> Their public IPs are 65.254.217.210-225 in the same order (ie:
> 65.254.217.210 goes to 10.1.1.2, 65.254.217.211 goes to 10.1.1.3, etc)*
>
>
> Is this something that should concern me?  At QTS we have public
> IPs on each of our servers.
>
> I'm running Asterisk on one of the machines as a PBX for all our remote
> users and I know that Asterisk and NAT do not mix very well.  To solve
> my NAT issues I've had to set most of the phones to register often to
> fix the issue of "dumb NAT box".  The firewall forgetting about the phone
> and its communication back to the PBX.
>
> Most of our other services should work fine being setup like this.  One
> issue is that in public DNS our server will be pointed to 65.X.X.X.  If one
> of the boxes on 10.X.X.X tries to communicate with a box by name that
> points to 65.X.X.X will that work?  I've know in the past using Linux
> Masquerading that this did not work for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Fowler
> OutPost Sentinel, LLC
> Support @ SIP/support at pbx.opsdc.com
>  or 678-804-8193
> Email Support @ support at outpostsentinel.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>



-- 
Greg Freemyer
Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
First 99 Days Litigation White Paper -
http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf

The Norcross Group
The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
http://www.norcrossgroup.com