[ale] Fedora 9
Michael H. Warfield
mhw at WittsEnd.com
Mon May 19 01:09:49 EDT 2008
Hey Jay...
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 00:30 -0400, Jay Finch wrote:
> Hey Mike,
> Can you think of any "gotchas" if I was wanting to update a FC6
> mail server to F9? I've been meaning to do something about it since
> FC6 was deprecated, but I haven't taken that plunge yet. :)
Ouch... FC6 to F9? Two choices... CD upgrade or 3 stage live yum
upgrade. I think the one big thing in that pile of changes is the
change in drives from hdx to sdx. If you are using LVM, that shouldn't
be a problem. If you are not, you have to be using labels or uuids in
fstab or you'll get shafted on a reboot.
Read the FAQ for Live Yum Upgrades here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
Pay special attention to each incremental change. A CD upgrade may be
able to avoid some of the gotchas, I don't know. The FC6 -> F7 is where
you get burned by the drive convention. You CAN do a live yum upgrade,
you just have to touch all the bases FC6 -> F7 -> F8 -> F9. It's time
consuming but I have done it. For remote systems, you don't have much
choice. If you have your hands on the console, you might be better with
a CD upgrade.
> Any advice would be appreciated.
> Thanks!
> Jay
Mike
> Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 19:13 -0400, Scott Castaline wrote:
> >
> > > Has anybody tried Fedora 9 yet? Any particular problems with the
> > > install? Any suggestions as to what to avoid?
> > >
> >
> > I've got several installations now.
> >
> > A few gotchas.
> >
> > If you are doing an upgrade make sure you have updated to the latest
> > updates first (especially if you love Emacs [yuck])!
> >
> > If you are thinking about doing a live yum upgrade from F8 to F9, read
> > the Fedora FAQ and follow those instructions carefully. It works and it
> > works well. Make sure you do the appropriate "yum clean all" steps.
> >
> > If you are thinking about trying out the new "preupgrade" that is
> > suppose to be an alternative to a live yum upgrade, I would pass.
> > IMHO... Not ready for prime time yet and no real advantage over live
> > yum upgrade and you will still be down for an hour or so.
> >
> > 64 bit live yum upgrade was a bit of a pain due to some lingering 32
> > bit applications. Just removing them and anything (32 bit only) that
> > depends on them and you're cool.
> >
> > If you have both dhclient and dhcp (server) installed on the system,
> > you're going to run into a conflict in the upgrade. Just remove the one
> > you are not using.
> >
> > If you are using IPSec (OpenSWAN) with X.509 certificates, beware. I'm
> > still sorting through the debris where that cratered. I had to
> > downgrade OpenSWAN back to the F8 version.
> >
> > On a limited number of systems, when you reboot you won't have X
> > Windows. Just remove /etc/X11/xorg.conf and try again. They're trying
> > to go configureless and some configurations and cards (ATI and maybe
> > others) are causing problems where no configuration file at all works.
> >
> > I've now done close to 12 systems in the last few days. Only real
> > heartburn was when my VPN went down because of the IPSec nonsense.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20080519/e54e5047/attachment.bin
More information about the Ale
mailing list