[ale] Web server OS

Joshua Chase joshua.d.chase at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 12:19:19 EST 2008


I am kind of with Aaron on this one, I also run CentOS on my production
dedicated servers. I think Ubuntu server would be a good pick as well, I've
just been using CentOS for so long on the server that I can easily say it is
very secure and stable. It does also have a GUI if you need it, you can just
pick runlevel 5 instead of 3 to run.

I will say I have been running Ubuntu server 8.04 at home for about three
months though and it's great for my home network

- Print Serving
- Samba sharing
- FAH
- internal lamp dev box

In any case, I don''t think you will have any issues with either distro,
CentOS is just the one I can say from experience is stable for all your LAMP
needs. If you want "easy to install / maintain" I don't think I would go
thte Gentoo route, although it is stable.

Josh

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:41 AM, David Hamm <ale at spinnerdog.com> wrote:

> Is there any kind of auto install for Gentoo?  I looked at installing
> Gentoo recently and it seemed every package would have to be compiled
> during the installation process.
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 09:47 -0500, Jim Kinney wrote:
> > emerge jeff
> >
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jeff Hubbs <hbbs at comcast.net> wrote:
> >         You might also try Gentoo, the meta-distribution that is
> >         versionless and
> >         only installs what you tell it beyond a very minimalist,
> >         functional OS
> >         that has a completely functional build system from the
> >         get-go.  You
> >         don't have to fool with finding different repositories, and
> >         the docs and
> >         online support are very good.
> >
> >         - Jeff
> >
> >
> >         Jim Kinney wrote:
> >         > My $0.20 is to use centos 5.2. Add the EPEL repo
> >         > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) and install wordpress
> >         with yum
> >         > install wordpress The base level OS is supported for another
> >         5 years
> >         > and the system is rock-solid stable. The EPEL packages are
> >         provided
> >         > and maintained by the upstream providers.
> >         >
> >         > Note: Centos and all RedHat derivatives will try (and
> >         usually suceed)
> >         > at installing X. This is because many tools for managaing
> >         the system
> >         > are gui-fied. The hard drive space is minimal and the X can
> >         be turned
> >         > off with a runlevel 3 in inittab.
> >         >
> >         > Note: I do NOT recommend the Fedora 10 distro for server use
> >         at this
> >         > time. They shift to all network sockets controlled by
> >         NetworkManager
> >         > is not as stable as it needs to be yet. It's fine for
> >         laptops (I'm
> >         > using it and like it a lot) but it's not for servers yet.
> >         >
> >         > Staying well back from bleeding edge is good. When F10 first
> >         came out
> >         > the x86_64 version was not "bleeding edge" it was a
> >         "spurting death
> >         > wound". It's feeling MUCH better now! My 64 bit laptop has
> >         been up for
> >         > about 8 days now without a hard reboot. Resuming from
> >         suspend or
> >         > hibernate still leaves Radeon chip is terminally stupid mode
> >         so that
> >         > has been avoided 'till I see a patch
> >         >
> >         > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, aaron <aaron at pd.org
> >
> >
> >         > <mailto:aaron at pd.org>> wrote:
> >         >
> >         >     Even knowing that Jon is active with the Ubuntu
> >         >     community, I'd have to throw in with CentOS.
> >         >
> >         >     In fact, I'll recommend CentOS twice, then you'll
> >         >     have my $.02 on the subject.
> >         >     ;-)
> >         >
> >         >     White box RedHat without the bleeding edge pains of
> >         >     Fedora.  It was my choice when I had to build a
> >         >     server for a Drupal development site last summer.
> >         >
> >         >     Someone mentioned Wordpress packages being in the
> >         >     Ubuntu repositories, but that may not be saying much.
> >         >     LAMP web packages like Wordpress and Drupal will
> >         >     generally install pretty easily on any common server
> >         >     distro, though I will note that I did have to add
> >         >     a non-default repository to get a yum-my Drupal
> >         >     installation into CentOS 5.
> >         >
> >         >     peace
> >         >     aaron
> >         >
> >         >     On 2008, Dec, 22, , at 10:57 PM, Jon Reagan wrote:
> >         >
> >         >     > hey folks... got a quick question.
> >         >     >
> >         >     > I have a new computer that I will be using as a web
> >         server.
> >         >      From past
> >         >     > experience, I know that the computer does not have any
> >         hardware that
> >         >     > presents compatibility issues.  So, with this in mind,
> >         which system
> >         >     > would y'all recommend for a complete noob looking to
> >         set up a
> >         >     > wordpress blog?
> >         >     >
> >         >     > I have been using Ubuntu, as well as Fedora and
> >         Debian... but I
> >         >     am not
> >         >     > sure which is best (or rather, easiest) for me to use.
> >         >     >
> >         >     > Thanks in advance!
> >         >     >
> >         >     > Jon
> >         >     > _______________________________________________
> >         >     > Ale mailing list
> >
> >         >     > Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
> >         >     > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >         >
> >         >     _______________________________________________
> >         >     Ale mailing list
> >
> >         >     Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
> >         >     http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > --
> >         > --
> >         > James P. Kinney III
> >         >
> >
> >         >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >         >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Ale mailing list
> >         > Ale at ale.org
> >         > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >         >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Ale mailing list
> >         Ale at ale.org
> >         http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > James P. Kinney III
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>



-- 
-Joshua Chase
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20081223/c6151dbd/attachment.html 


More information about the Ale mailing list