[ale] Vista vs Linux
Igor Kresnik
kresnik.igor at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 04:28:17 EDT 2007
its possible to install vista and Linux on one hard drive?
Igor
Step pravi:
> Windows apparently really dropped the ball with Vista. Here's hoping
> that everyone and their mother takes this opportunity and runs with it
> - there's no way one OS should have 90+% marketshare in today's world.
>
> On 3/27/07, *Ned Williams* <nedj10 at gmail.com
> <mailto:nedj10 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Funny, Suse/Novell has been telling that exact same thing to every
> corporate and govt entity they can get the sales hands on :D
>
> Ned
>
>
>
> On 3/27/07, *Dow_Hurst * <dhurst at mindspring.com
> <mailto:dhurst at mindspring.com>> wrote:
>
> Just got my latest issue of Linux Magazine. There is a nice
> article outlining the major differences between Vista and
> current Linux distros. It shows where Vista is better and
> where Linux distros are better. I found it helpful since I've
> not paid any attention to Vista's feature set. It does sound
> like Vista has some pluses over XP but also some major
> inconveniences. If you do have to deal with Vista then having
> the more expensive versions like Home Ultimate or Business
> level versions seems important. Even the big guys like
> corporations and universities will have to have Microsoft
> issue a license for each instance of Vista installed. No more
> corporate or edu install CDs that are prelicensed for ease of
> use. I was amazed at how little effort it would take to offer
> a Linux distro that would equal Vista in every way. From a
> user's perspective adding and preconfiguring for ease of use a
> selection of applications such as what is found on Macs by
> default, the Ilife stuff,
> would be the major component. Next would have to be legal
> codecs, which any of the big distro distributors would have to
> license and pass on the fee to the consumer via purchaseable
> install DVDs. That would pretty much take care of it. It was
> interesting to learn that typical home versions of Vista are
> not allowed to be run in a virtual machine.
> Thanks,
> Dow
>
> No sig.
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> <http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
More information about the Ale
mailing list