[ale] CIFS <-> NFS bridge?

[Ned Williams]

What version of NFS and did you play around with the NFS packet sizes and
what not? Normally that is usually the culprit with large files and nfs
servers

Ned

On 7/24/07, Dylan Northrup <docx at io.com> wrote:
>
> I am in a situation where I need to have a system to translate between a
> CIFS file server and an NFS client.  I found Trellis NAS Bridge Appliance
> (TNBA) and Gateway for NFS from Microsoft when searching google, but
> neither
> seem to allow re-exportation of shared filesystems via NFS.
>
> Let me explain what I want to do so folks can poke holes in my ideas.  We
> have a file server that can only be accessed via CIFS and a linux server
> at
> a 2.4 kernel level.  The files we're accessing are media files and are
> typically greater than 2G in size.  We tested the most recent samba
> release
> on the 2.4 kernel and it does not properly handle files of that size.
> Accessing large files via NFS does not seem to have that
> problem.  Updating
> the kernel on the linux box would require an extensive certification
> process
> for the software we are running on it and is something we'd like to avoid,
> if possible.
>
> We've tested putting a linux server with an updated kernel between the
> file
> server and the older box.  While I was able to mount SMB shares and
> properly
> view them as well as export directories via NFS, I was unable to access
> any
> of the SMB files via NFS (client timed out on the NFS calls).
>
> We'd like to have a box sitting between the file server and the linux
> server
> that will allow mounting of SMB shares and re-exporting them via NFS.
> Replacing the file server isn't an option.
>
> --
> Dylan Northrup - docx at io.com - http://www.io.com/~docx/
> "Harder to work, harder to strive, hard to be glad to be alive, but it's
>   really worth it if you give it a try." -- Cowboy Mouth, 'Easy'
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...