[ale] Linux NAS Distribution
Jerald Sheets
questy at gmail.com
Sun Jul 8 11:19:40 EDT 2007
Well, that's my point.
It seems that SuSE "off-the-shelf" (tm) did just fine in being a NAS
without getting into a special distro.
You could actually just take what you know, build a linux box to your
specs, share out the file area via NFS, and you're ready to go.
Or am I still being dense and missing something? (entirely likely)
--j
On Jul 8, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 22:47 -0400, ale-request at ale.org wrote:
>> I mean,
>> if it'll handle a few million a day for us...
>
> I'm just looking at is what out there. I do not have the traffic you
> have for storing our files. We store things like ACT! databases
> backups, MS Office documents, Marketing stuff, etc. Normal office
> type
> stuff. What I want to build is a NAS that has 2 identical drives in a
> software RAID1 configuration. I also want either a DVD-RW or Blu-Ray
> burner so that I can make backups. We have so much stuff that it
> is not
> feasible to backup on DVD anymore. The capacity of Blu-Ray looks
> promising. The burners are still pricey though. With a NAS
> distribution I can just build a PC that meets those requirements and
> control it via a browser like FreeNAS does. If the DVD backup was
> integrated into the web interface then someone other than me could do
> their own backups.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
More information about the Ale
mailing list