[ale] Cablemodem problems (Charter); DSL maybe
Ken Cochran
kwc at TheWorld.com
Mon Aug 20 23:17:22 EDT 2007
>From: "James P. Kinney III" <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
>Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:23:22 -0400
>Subject: Re: [ale] Cablemodem problems (Charter); DSL maybe
>
>
>For reasons best left to <rant> formatting, cable modems are apparently
>very picky about grounding. To add to that, they are also very poorly
>installed in most situations. The best thing _you_ can do is to get a
>groundrod from the hardware store and pound it in yourself. Then run
>appropriately sized bare copper from the ground in your power breaker
>box to it. Repeat for the ground connection from the cable feed. Be sure
>to use solid mechanical connection and use the anti corrosion grease.
Both telco & cable enter the house by "their" NIDs, each on the
outside wall nearby the electrical service/meter. All are
common-grounded (per code) to a single deep-driven rod directly
below the power box (constructed in early 1970s). It's on a
lake, so there is a high water table; I'd think that would make
for very good grounding. (?) Grounding has been inspected
before, by both telco & cableco techs & by me & my electrician(s)
and they report no problems. And it looks good to me now. {shrug}
Services are underground in plastic conduit from the house to a
pole, about 75 feet, and from that pole to the street pole, in
the air about another 75-80 feet. The "middle" pole is *not*
grounded, neither for phone nor cable nor power; also, it's on
"their" side of any NIDs, so any grounding there is utilities'
responsibility. I think the "street" pole is grounded for
everything. (Hmm, it'd have to be, it has a power transformer
too and the power people here *always* ground transformers.)
Internal house cabling is RG-6 with "snap'n seal" conectors.
>From the house to the street is RG-11, with similar connectors.
Any other ideas? I just can't believe the cableco's outside
plant is so temperature sensitive that they have to have a
crew "retune" it seasonally. But right now I'm not getting
more than about 30 minutes at a time of ip-connectivity.
Then it's out for roughly another 30 minutes, "cycling" like
this all the time.
-kc
>On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 16:21 -0400, Ken Cochran wrote:
>> Hi ALErs:
>>
>> Sort of a 2-part question/problem, cablemodem problems vs DSL:
>> (Lesser of 2 evils?)
>>
>> 1. (Charter) Cablemodem service problems: You folks in the
>> cableco/outside plant world can maybe help me with this?
>>
>> I've been having problems with Charter (cablemodem) for a long
>> time now (a couple of years or more, I track the tickets) and I'm
>> wondering if now that I can get dsl at my location, it might be
>> time to change.
>>
>> At roughly regular intervals of every few months, I get sporadic
>> loss & restart of IP, TV works fine, usually the cablemodem
>> itself (& subsequently the dispatched tech) reports good signal
>> levels/s:n ratios, etc. What happens is a loss of Internet
>> communications every few minutes, lasting for a few minutes.
>> Netstat reports non-zero send-Qs when this is "underway."
>> Traceroute doesn't even make it as far as the 1st hop. A little
>> while later, things resume as if nothing ever happened. This
>> repeats all the time. Currently, this has been happening since
>> Friday afternoon and has not been corrected. Last time (mid-May
>> 2007) also took several days to correct. The cablemodem itself
>> reported a borderline signal level; repair took a line tech.
>>
>> Last couple of times (& now, still experiencing this), the
>> visiting (house services) tech says he has to dispatch a "line
>> tech" to "rebalance" (?) the neighborhood lines (along the
>> street). He says it is because of the change in (weather)
>> seasons and/or ambient temperatures (going either hot or cold)
>> that causes this & line techs have to come out & rebalance these
>> a few times per year (roughly seasonally). Any idea(s) as to
>> just what is happening here? Sounds like BS to me; I find it
>> hard to believe that a cableco has to go out & redo its outside
>> plant 2-4 times a year to correct for what sounds to me like
>> design deficiencies in said outside plant.
>>
>> Some local setup details:
>> Cablemodem is a Motorola SurfBoard SB4101. Distance from service
>> entrance to the "node" (coax to fiber converter) is about 2000
>> feet via coax that's about as big around as my thumb. Outside
>> plant is from Scientific Atlanta.
>>
>> 2. DSL: Location, Alexander City, Alabama (east central AL),
>> ILEC & my local service is Bellsouth/ATT and DSL has only
>> recently become available at my location. It looks like my
>> pickins' are slim wrt carriers. I'm about 6500 feet from the
>> "remote" box (or pair-gain mux or whatever they're calling
>> that thing nowadays...) that serves my area.
>>
>> a. Recommended (or not) carriers
>> Unless some things have changed/added, I think Bellsouth/ATT
>> might be my only option for DSL but I need to check further.
>> Any recommendations for/against alternatives? I think my
>> available options *might* be HiWaay (hq in Huntsville AL) or
>> maybe SpeakEasy (but last time I checked, they don't serve
>> here) or EarthLink/Mindspring (also an unknown right now).
>> Looks like I *can* get the $10/month DSL here (with the 1yr
>> committment of course); anyone besides Bellsouth/ATT doing
>> anything similar? Naturally I have problem(s) with ATT's
>> customer monitoring but I may have to put up with this
>> nastiness just to have Internet access that works at all. :-(
>>
>> b. NAT issues
>> I see the little Westell modems from Bellsouth at customers'
>> homes & notice the following:
>> - The modem itself handles the PPPoE/PPPoA stuff nowadays,
>> so no need for that on the client computer.
>> - The client computer gets a gets an RFC1918 private
>> address, 192.168.100.x iirc.
>>
>> My own internal private network is also RFC1918 & 192.168.x.y.
>> If I change to DSL with its required PPPo{EA}, it appears
>> that I'll become "double-NAT"ed; is this a problem? If so,
>> how do I deal with it?
More information about the Ale
mailing list