[ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real

[Scott Castaline]

Jeff Lightner wrote:
> My point was that in global systems it is always possible you'll end up
> with an interlink you didn't anticipate.  If for example Wife's_Friend
> 3.0 is temporarily established in Restaurant 5.0 at the same time as
> Girlfriend 10.0 is established there along with Husband 1.0 the
> consequences can be disastrous.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Lane
> Oden
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:09 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
> 
> But you can isolate Wife 2.0 and Girlfriend 10.0 by running them on
> separate systems. It's important to keep Wife 2.0 and Girlfriend 10.0
> physically and logically separate. It is not recommended to run these
> two applications in a chroot jail. Proper security boundaries must be
> implemented to avoid crosstalk. Girlfriend 10.0 is often accepting of
> the Wife 2.0 instance, however rarely is it the case that the opposite
> is true. 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
> Lightner
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:47 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
> 
> 
> You think Wife 2.0 has issues with that - see what happens if you try to
> install Girlfriend 10.0 in the same system or even in a different system
> on a different lan - eventually some interlink will cause you problems.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Dan
> Lambert
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:11 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
> 
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:02 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>> On 4/13/07, Dan Lambert <danlambert at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:12 -0400, Jeff Lightner wrote:
>>>> I certainly know the difference between Kovacs and Caesar.   For
> some
>>>> reason I associate Imogene with Kovacs but right after I'd sent
> the
>>>> email I had noticed she didn't appear in the link I sent so did
> some
>>>> Googling and didn't find anything that associates them together. 
>>>> Apparently the pointers in my memory structures had a single bit
> parity
>>>> issue.   Despite that I won't panic...
>>> ----- el snippo-----
>>>
>>> I've been having parity issues with the installed RAM for years,
> Jeff.
>>> Sometimes it's magic, and sometimes it ain't.
>>>
>>> Not to worry a simple reboot brings things back for a little bit. At
> 
>>> least until someone asks a question that I have to do a DB search
> on.
>>> Dan
>> I'm not sure it helps, but rinsing my internal CPU in alcohol is part 
>> of my routine maintenance.
>>
>> Greg
> 
> I've found that good Irish Ales and Stouts have the desired effects, but
> I can't keep the RAM awash in those substances continuously, or Wife 2.0
> tends to start having issues with my OS.
> 
> Dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> 
> 
> The information transmitted is the property of NCP Solutions and is
> intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain confidential, 
> proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon
> this information by 
> persons or entities, other than the intended recipient, is prohibited.
> If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from all computers. 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
Can you stack virtual machines on each other? Host 1 runs Linux, Guest 1 
runs whatever is now Host 2, Guest 2 runs whatever on top of Host 2 and 
becomes Host 3 etc, etc then create a 2nd similar stack of VMs. Use 2 
USB Mon/Kybd/Mouse combos one for wife 2.0 on one VM stack and 
Girlfriend 10.0 on 2nd VM stack. Of course they would be in separate 
rooms unbeknown st to each other. I don't know it seems like a good idea 
and was clear after about 8 Guiness or was it 10 , maybe 
13,,,,,,,,,,,,,thump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!