[ale] g77 vs gfortran

[Geoffrey]

Dow_Hurst wrote:
> Geoffrey, I got a compile to work!  After rereading the following and
> getting the instructions correct, the compile worked:

Excellent!

> 
> BEGIN### One problem was that I forgot to comment out the SGI
> specific date calls (the lines preceded with C at UG in datprt). So now,
> if you leave all comments in then it should not try to bother with
> figuring out the date, so it should compile. Then one can experiment
> with uncommenting C at G7 or whichever - maybe the AB (Absoft) or EF
> (Intel) works. If none works, but you can tell me the syntax to
> getting the time/date  then I will implement a new symbol and a new
> alternative code using it. END###
> 
> The C at UG are symbols added to comment out specific parts of the code
> dealing with OS specific lines.  So when I left all the C at G7 lines
> alone and all the comments were left in place, the compile finished.
> When I removed the Linux specific C at G7 symbols then I got the error
> you saw in the last email.  Let me know if you want to look at the
> code.  I'll check with Dr. Mezei about it as he would want to give
> permission on that.  I don't think he as opensourced the code but
> I'll check on that too. Dow

I'd be glad to look at the code.  Nothing more fun then digging through 
code.  Seriously.  Okay, so I'm twisted....

If you get permission to share the code, fire it across. :)

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

War never solved anything, well, except slavery, fascism and communism