[ale] RedHat Enterprise vs. FreeBSD

[Eichler, Paula J. CDC/OCOO/ITSO]

Thanks for the replies, guys.  I will have to do more research into the
tools you describe.  I am pretty familiar with how RedHat works, but I
have never used a BSD installation.  RHEL seems pretty straightforward
to patch, but I was told that FreeBSD was easier to maintain.  I need to
know why and sound like I know what I am talking about ;) ...pj

  _____  

From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
To: ale at ale.org
fd0man(tm)-The Magical Floppy Man
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 2:37 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] RedHat Enterprise vs. FreeBSD


On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 13:51 -0400, Eichler, Paula J. (CDC/OCOO/ITSO)
wrote:


	Can anyone point me to any comparison documentation on RedHat
Enterprise and FreeBSD?  Firsthand experience is relevant, as well.
Specifically, I am interested in the advantage either one has over the
other in installation, maintenance/patch management and ease of
hardening.  Thanks ..pj
	
	

I have no first-hand experience with RHEL, however, I do have experience
with FreeBSD and Linux in general, in many forms.  The best advantage
that I can say for FreeBSD is the easy to use file system snapshots
functionality, which eases the back-up process, providing on-line
backups for UFS2 file systems in any arrangement,
<http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/snapshots.htm
l>  and is even integrated with the "dump" utility.  Linux supports file
system snapshots as best as I can tell for the XFS file system, but only
if LVM is used.  I have never used a system with LVM on it, nor the XFS
file system, so somebody else would be better equipped to tell you more
about that.

Other than that, FreeBSD is about as easy to install as Slackware or
older versions of Red Hat, and after it is set up is not that hard to
get up and running.  There are many ways to harden the system, including
OPIE (One-time Passwords In Everything), and various IP filtering
capabilities are available.  It is a well thought out system, and has
excellent reference documentation that is available for the current
releases.

Not to sound like Linux is bad-it is far from it.  However, I have found
that I rather like FreeBSD if I need to set up a server very quickly for
someone and it needs to be reliable, secure, and easy for them to
administer.  Of course, your mileage may vary.  However, I think that
the very easy to set-up and use filesystem snapshots are an invaluable
thing to have, and they are the reason that I have chosen FreeBSD over
Linux for production servers.

    - Mike


--

The fd0man(tm)-The Magical Floppy Man! (fd0man at gmail.com) 
"One world, one web, one program"  -Microsoft promotional ad 
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer"  -Adolf Hitler 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...